Why Study History?
By Peter N. Stearns
People live in the present. They plan for and worry about the future.
History, however, is the study of the past. Given all the demands that press in
from living in the present and anticipating what is yet to come, why bother
with what has been? Given all the desirable and available branches of
knowledge, why insist—as most American educational programs do—on a good bit of
history? And why urge many students to study even more history than they are
required to?
Any subject of study needs justification: its advocates must explain why
it is worth attention. Most widely accepted subjects—and history is certainly
one of them—attract some people who simply like the information and modes of
thought involved. But audiences less spontaneously drawn to the subject and
more doubtful about why to bother need to know what the purpose is.
Historians do not perform heart transplants, improve highway design, or
arrest criminals. In a society that quite correctly expects education to serve
useful purposes, the functions of history can seem more difficult to define
than those of engineering or medicine. History is in fact very useful, actually
indispensable, but the products of historical study are less tangible,
sometimes less immediate, than those that stem from some other disciplines.
In the past history has been justified for reasons we would no longer
accept. For instance, one of the reasons history holds its place in current
education is because earlier leaders believed that a knowledge of certain
historical facts helped distinguish the educated from the uneducated; the
person who could reel off the date of the Norman conquest of England (1066) or
the name of the person who came up with the theory of evolution at about the
same time that Darwin did (Wallace) was deemed superior—a better candidate for
law school or even a business promotion. Knowledge of historical facts has been
used as a screening device in many societies, from China to the United States,
and the habit is still with us to some extent. Unfortunately, this use can
encourage mindless memorization—a real but not very appealing aspect of the
discipline.
|
|
|
|
History should
be studied
because it
is essential to
individuals and
to society, and
because it
harbors beauty.
|
|
|
|
History should be studied because it is essential to individuals and to
society, and because it harbors beauty. There are many ways to discuss the real
functions of the subject—as there are many different historical talents and
many different paths to historical meaning. All definitions of history's
utility, however, rely on two fundamental facts.
History Helps Us Understand People and
Societies
In the first place, history offers a storehouse of information about how
people and societies behave. Understanding the operations of people and
societies is difficult, though a number of disciplines make the attempt. An
exclusive reliance on current data would needlessly handicap our efforts. How
can we evaluate war if the nation is at peace—unless we use historical
materials? How can we understand genius, the influence of technological
innovation, or the role that beliefs play in shaping family life, if we don't
use what we know about experiences in the past? Some social scientists attempt
to formulate laws or theories about human behavior. But even these recourses
depend on historical information, except for in limited, often artificial cases
in which experiments can be devised to determine how people act. Major aspects
of a society's operation, like mass elections, missionary activities, or
military alliances, cannot be set up as precise experiments. Consequently,
history must serve, however imperfectly, as our laboratory, and data from the
past must serve as our most vital evidence in the unavoidable quest to figure
out why our complex species behaves as it does in societal settings. This,
fundamentally, is why we cannot stay away from history: it offers the only
extensive evidential base for the contemplation and analysis of how societies
function, and people need to have some sense of how societies function simply
to run their own lives.
History Helps Us Understand Change and How
the Society We Live in Came to Be
The second reason history is inescapable as a subject of serious study
follows closely on the first. The past causes the present, and so the future.
Any time we try to know why something happened—whether a shift in political
party dominance in the American Congress, a major change in the teenage suicide
rate, or a war in the Balkans or the Middle East—we have to look for factors
that took shape earlier. Sometimes fairly recent history will suffice to
explain a major development, but often we need to look further back to identify
the causes of change. Only through studying history can we grasp how things
change; only through history can we begin to comprehend the factors that cause
change; and only through history can we understand what elements of an
institution or a society persist despite change.
The importance of history in explaining and understanding change in
human behavior is no mere abstraction. Take an important human phenomenon such
as alcoholism. Through biological experiments scientists have identified
specific genes that seem to cause a proclivity toward alcohol addiction in some
individuals. This is a notable advance. But alcoholism, as a social reality,
has a history: rates of alcoholism have risen and fallen, and they have varied
from one group to the next. Attitudes and policies about alcoholism have also
changed and varied. History is indispensable to understanding why such changes
occur. And in many ways historical analysis is a more challenging kind of
exploration than genetic experimentation. Historians have in fact greatly
contributed in recent decades to our understanding of trends (or patterns of
change) in alcoholism and to our grasp of the dimensions of addiction as an
evolving social problem.
One of the leading concerns of contemporary American politics is low
voter turnout, even for major elections. A historical analysis of changes in
voter turnout can help us begin to understand the problem we face today. What
were turnouts in the past? When did the decline set in? Once we determine when
the trend began, we can try to identify which of the factors present at the
time combined to set the trend in motion. Do the same factors sustain the trend
still, or are there new ingredients that have contributed to it in more recent
decades? A purely contemporary analysis may shed some light on the problem, but
a historical assessment is clearly fundamental—and essential for anyone
concerned about American political health today.
History, then, provides the only extensive materials available to study
the human condition. It also focuses attention on the complex processes of
social change, including the factors that are causing change around us today.
Here, at base, are the two related reasons many people become enthralled with
the examination of the past and why our society requires and encourages the
study of history as a major subject in the schools.
The Importance of History in Our Own Lives
These two fundamental reasons for studying history underlie more
specific and quite diverse uses of history in our own lives. History well told
is beautiful. Many of the historians who most appeal to the general reading
public know the importance of dramatic and skillful writing—as well as of
accuracy. Biography and military history appeal in part because of the tales
they contain. History as art and entertainment serves a real purpose, on
aesthetic grounds but also on the level of human understanding. Stories well
done are stories that reveal how people and societies have actually functioned,
and they prompt thoughts about the human experience in other times and places.
The same aesthetic and humanistic goals inspire people to immerse themselves in
efforts to reconstruct quite remote pasts, far removed from immediate,
present-day utility. Exploring what historians sometimes call the
"pastness of the past"—the ways people in distant ages constructed
their lives—involves a sense of beauty and excitement, and ultimately another
perspective on human life and society.
History Contributes to Moral Understanding
History also provides a terrain for moral contemplation. Studying the
stories of individuals and situations in the past allows a student of history
to test his or her own moral sense, to hone it against some of the real
complexities individuals have faced in difficult settings. People who have
weathered adversity not just in some work of fiction, but in real, historical
circumstances can provide inspiration. "History teaching by example"
is one phrase that describes this use of a study of the past—a study not only
of certifiable heroes, the great men and women of history who successfully
worked through moral dilemmas, but also of more ordinary people who provide
lessons in courage, diligence, or constructive protest.
History Provides Identity
History also helps provide identity, and this is unquestionably one of
the reasons all modern nations encourage its teaching in some form. Historical
data include evidence about how families, groups, institutions and whole
countries were formed and about how they have evolved while retaining cohesion.
For many Americans, studying the history of one's own family is the most
obvious use of history, for it provides facts about genealogy and (at a
slightly more complex level) a basis for understanding how the family has
interacted with larger historical change. Family identity is established and
confirmed. Many institutions, businesses, communities, and social units, such
as ethnic groups in the United States, use history for similar identity
purposes. Merely defining the group in the present pales against the
possibility of forming an identity based on a rich past. And of course nations
use identity history as well—and sometimes abuse it. Histories that tell the
national story, emphasizing distinctive features of the national experience,
are meant to drive home an understanding of national values and a commitment to
national loyalty.
Studying History Is Essential for Good
Citizenship
A study of history is essential for good citizenship. This is the most
common justification for the place of history in school curricula. Sometimes
advocates of citizenship history hope merely to promote national identity and
loyalty through a history spiced by vivid stories and lessons in individual
success and morality. But the importance of history for citizenship goes beyond
this narrow goal and can even challenge it at some points.
History that lays the foundation for genuine citizenship returns, in one
sense, to the essential uses of the study of the past. History provides data
about the emergence of national institutions, problems, and values—it's the
only significant storehouse of such data available. It offers evidence also
about how nations have interacted with other societies, providing international
and comparative perspectives essential for responsible citizenship. Further,
studying history helps us understand how recent, current, and prospective
changes that affect the lives of citizens are emerging or may emerge and what
causes are involved. More important, studying history encourages habits of mind
that are vital for responsible public behavior, whether as a national or
community leader, an informed voter, a petitioner, or a simple observer.
What Skills Does a Student of History
Develop?
What does a well-trained student of history, schooled to work on past
materials and on case studies in social change, learn how to do? The list is
manageable, but it contains several overlapping categories.
The Ability to Assess Evidence. The study of history builds experience in
dealing with and assessing various kinds of evidence—the sorts of evidence
historians use in shaping the most accurate pictures of the past that they can.
Learning how to interpret the statements of past political leaders—one kind of
evidence—helps form the capacity to distinguish between the objective and the
self-serving among statements made by present-day political leaders. Learning
how to combine different kinds of evidence—public statements, private records, numerical
data, visual materials—develops the ability to make coherent arguments based on
a variety of data. This skill can also be applied to information encountered in
everyday life.
The Ability to Assess Conflicting Interpretations. Learning history means gaining some skill in
sorting through diverse, often conflicting interpretations. Understanding how
societies work—the central goal of historical study—is inherently imprecise,
and the same certainly holds true for understanding what is going on in the present
day. Learning how to identify and evaluate conflicting interpretations is an
essential citizenship skill for which history, as an often-contested laboratory
of human experience, provides training. This is one area in which the full
benefits of historical study sometimes clash with the narrower uses of the past
to construct identity. Experience in examining past situations provides a
constructively critical sense that can be applied to partisan claims about the
glories of national or group identity. The study of history in no sense
undermines loyalty or commitment, but it does teach the need for assessing
arguments, and it provides opportunities to engage in debate and achieve
perspective.
Experience in Assessing Past Examples of Change. Experience in assessing past examples of
change is vital to understanding change in society today—it's an essential
skill in what we are regularly told is our "ever-changing world."
Analysis of change means developing some capacity for determining the magnitude
and significance of change, for some changes are more fundamental than others.
Comparing particular changes to relevant examples from the past helps students
of history develop this capacity. The ability to identify the continuities that
always accompany even the most dramatic changes also comes from studying
history, as does the skill to determine probable causes of change. Learning
history helps one figure out, for example, if one main factor—such as a
technological innovation or some deliberate new policy—accounts for a change or
whether, as is more commonly the case, a number of factors combine to generate
the actual change that occurs.
Historical study, in sum, is crucial to the promotion of that elusive
creature, the well-informed citizen. It provides basic factual information
about the background of our political institutions and about the values and
problems that affect our social well-being. It also contributes to our capacity
to use evidence, assess interpretations, and analyze change and continuities. No
one can ever quite deal with the present as the historian deals with the
past—we lack the perspective for this feat; but we can move in this direction
by applying historical habits of mind, and we will function as better citizens
in the process.
History Is Useful in the World of Work
History is useful for work. Its study helps create good businesspeople,
professionals, and political leaders. The number of explicit professional jobs
for historians is considerable, but most people who study history do not become
professional historians. Professional historians teach at various levels, work
in museums and media centers, do historical research for businesses or public
agencies, or participate in the growing number of historical consultancies.
These categories are important—indeed vital—to keep the basic enterprise of
history going, but most people who study history use their training for broader
professional purposes. Students of history find their experience directly
relevant to jobs in a variety of careers as well as to further study in fields
like law and public administration. Employers often deliberately seek students
with the kinds of capacities historical study promotes. The reasons are not
hard to identify: students of history acquire, by studying different phases of
the past and different societies in the past, a broad perspective that gives
them the range and flexibility required in many work situations. They develop
research skills, the ability to find and evaluate sources of information, and
the means to identify and evaluate diverse interpretations. Work in history
also improves basic writing and speaking skills and is directly relevant to
many of the analytical requirements in the public and private sectors, where
the capacity to identify, assess, and explain trends is essential. Historical
study is unquestionably an asset for a variety of work and professional
situations, even though it does not, for most students, lead as directly to a
particular job slot, as do some technical fields. But history particularly
prepares students for the long haul in their careers, its qualities helping
adaptation and advancement beyond entry-level employment. There is no denying
that in our society many people who are drawn to historical study worry about
relevance. In our changing economy, there is concern about job futures in most
fields. Historical training is not, however, an indulgence; it applies directly
to many careers and can clearly help us in our working lives.
What Kind of History Should We Study?
The question of why we should study history entails several subsidiary
issues about what kind of history should be studied. Historians and the general
public alike can generate a lot of heat about what specific history courses
should appear in what part of the curriculum. Many of the benefits of history
derive from various kinds of history, whether local or national or focused on
one culture or the world. Gripping instances of history as storytelling, as
moral example, and as analysis come from all sorts of settings. The most
intense debates about what history should cover occur in relation to identity
history and the attempt to argue that knowledge of certain historical facts
marks one as an educated person. Some people feel that in order to become good
citizens students must learn to recite the preamble of the American
constitution or be able to identify Thomas Edison—though many historians would
dissent from an unduly long list of factual obligations. Correspondingly, some
feminists, eager to use history as part of their struggle, want to make sure
that students know the names of key past leaders such as Susan B. Anthony. The
range of possible survey and memorization chores is considerable—one reason
that history texts are often quite long.
There is a fundamental tension in teaching and learning history between
covering facts and developing historical habits of mind. Because history
provides an immediate background to our own life and age, it is highly
desirable to learn about forces that arose in the past and continue to affect
the modern world. This type of knowledge requires some attention to
comprehending the development of national institutions and trends. It also
demands some historical understanding of key forces in the wider world. The
ongoing tension between Christianity and Islam, for instance, requires some
knowledge of patterns that took shape over 12 centuries ago. Indeed, the
pressing need to learn about issues of importance throughout the world is the
basic reason that world history has been gaining ground in American
curriculums. Historical habits of mind are enriched when we learn to compare
different patterns of historical development, which means some study of other
national traditions and civilizations.
The key to developing historical habits of mind, however, is having
repeated experience in historical inquiry. Such experience should involve a
variety of materials and a diversity of analytical problems. Facts are
essential in this process, for historical analysis depends on data, but it does
not matter whether these facts come from local, national, or world
history—although it's most useful to study a range of settings. What matters is
learning how to assess different magnitudes of historical change, different
examples of conflicting interpretations, and multiple kinds of evidence.
Developing the ability to repeat fundamental thinking habits through
increasingly complex exercises is essential. Historical processes and
institutions that are deemed especially important to specific curriculums can,
of course, be used to teach historical inquiry. Appropriate balance is the
obvious goal, with an insistence on factual knowledge not allowed to overshadow
the need to develop historical habits of mind.
Exposure to certain essential historical episodes and experience in
historical inquiry are crucial to any program of historical study, but they
require supplement. No program can be fully functional if it does not allow for
whimsy and individual taste. Pursuing particular stories or types of problems,
simply because they tickle the fancy, contributes to a rounded intellectual
life. Similarly, no program in history is complete unless it provides some
understanding of the ongoing role of historical inquiry in expanding our
knowledge of the past and, with it, of human and social behavior. The past two
decades have seen a genuine explosion of historical information and analysis,
as additional facets of human behavior have been subjected to research and
interpretation. And there is every sign that historians are continuing to
expand our understanding of the past. It's clear that the discipline of history
is a source of innovation and not merely a framework for repeated renderings of
established data and familiar stories.
Why study history? The answer is because we virtually must, to gain
access to the laboratory of human experience. When we study it reasonably well,
and so acquire some usable habits of mind, as well as some basic data about the
forces that affect our own lives, we emerge with relevant skills and an enhanced
capacity for informed citizenship, critical thinking, and simple awareness. The
uses of history are varied. Studying history can help us develop some literally
"salable" skills, but its study must not be pinned down to the
narrowest utilitarianism. Some history—that confined to personal recollections
about changes and continuities in the immediate environment—is essential to
function beyond childhood. Some history depends on personal taste, where one
finds beauty, the joy of discovery, or intellectual challenge. Between the
inescapable minimum and the pleasure of deep commitment comes the history that,
through cumulative skill in interpreting the unfolding human record, provides a
real grasp of how the world works.
Further Reading
Holt, Thomas C. Thinking Historically: Narrative, Imagination, and
Understanding. New York: College Entrance Examination Board, 1990.
Howe, Barbara. Careers for Students of History. Washington, D.C.:
American Historical Association, 1989.
Hexter, J. H. The History Primer. New York: Basic Books, 1971.
Gagnon, Paul, ed. Historical Literacy. New York: MacMillan, 1989.
Oakeshott, Michael. On History. Totowa, N.J.: Barnes and Noble,
1983.
Stearns, Peter N. Meaning over Memory: Recasting the Teaching of
History and Culture. Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press,
1993.
© 1998, American Historical Association.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario